GRID K520Q vs HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1358not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeGK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 May 2011 (14 years ago)2 July 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61536 ×2
Core clock speed350 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data95.36 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data32 ×2
TMUsno data128 ×2
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB ×2
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2011 2 July 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

GRID K520Q has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) and GRID K520Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) is a notebook graphics card while GRID K520Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
NVIDIA GRID K520Q
GRID K520Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 98 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K520Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) or GRID K520Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.