Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs HD Graphics P5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT2Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)13 April 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924480
Core clock speed700 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors1,300 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00707.0
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs3128
TMUs24280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L0 Cacheno data2.2 MB
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.1.801.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 13 April 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 281 Watt

HD Graphics P5700 has 1773.3% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics P5700 and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics P5700 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P5700
HD Graphics P5700
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15 votes

Rate HD Graphics P5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics P5700 or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.