Radeon HD 8210E vs HD Graphics P5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1310
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.93
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT2Kalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)23 April 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192128
Core clock speed700 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,300 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt9 Watt
Texture fill rate24.002.400
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs34
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.801.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 23 April 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 9 Watt

HD Graphics P5700 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8210E, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics P5700 and Radeon HD 8210E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics P5700 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8210E is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P5700
HD Graphics P5700
AMD Radeon HD 8210E
Radeon HD 8210E

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 15 votes

Rate HD Graphics P5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics P5700 or Radeon HD 8210E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.