Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs HD Graphics P530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking867not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.19no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)1 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924096
Core clock speed350 MHz1156 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1247 MHz
Number of transistors189 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate18.40319.2
Floating-point processing power0.4416 TFLOPSno data
ROPs364
TMUs16256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data152 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1740 MB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data409.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.1.97-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 1 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

HD Graphics P530 has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Nano, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 370.8% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics P530 and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P530
HD Graphics P530
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 28 votes

Rate HD Graphics P530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics P530 or Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.