Quadro 3000M X2 vs HD Graphics P530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking799not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2EXMF104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24240
Core clock speed350 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate18.4018.00
Floating-point performance0.4416 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1740 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.1.97N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

HD Graphics P530 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

3000M X2, on the other hand, has a 17.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics P530 and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics P530 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P530
HD Graphics P530
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 22 votes

Rate HD Graphics P530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.