Arc A750 vs HD Graphics P4700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.63
Power efficiencyno data10.31
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 June 2013 (12 years ago)12 October 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1603584
Core clock speed350 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors392 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate26.00537.6
Floating-point processing power0.416 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs2112
TMUs20224
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2013 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 225 Watt

HD Graphics P4700 has 161.6% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 266.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics P4700 and Arc A750. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P4700
HD Graphics P4700
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1052 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics P4700 or Arc A750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.