GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample vs HD Graphics P4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1091not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.10no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT2NV36S
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 May 2012 (13 years ago)18 August 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed650 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,200 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate20.001.700
Floating-point processing power0.32 TFLOPSno data
ROPs14
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.01.5 (full) 2.0 (partial)
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2012 18 August 2003
Chip lithography 22 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

HD Graphics P4000 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 490.9% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5700 Engineering Sample, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics P4000 and GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P4000
HD Graphics P4000
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample
GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 110 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics P4000 or GeForce FX 5700 Engineering Sample, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.