GMA 3150 vs HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and GMA 3150, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
2012
0.60
+5900%

HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) outperforms GMA 3150 by a whopping 5900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12171554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.05
ArchitectureGen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2012)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Pineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores616
Core clock speed350 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data123 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.8
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.09.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
Valorant 27−30 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Valorant 27−30 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Valorant 27−30 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 3−4 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.60 0.01
Recency 1 October 2012 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm

HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) has a 5900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) is our recommended choice as it beats the GMA 3150 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 56 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 148 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.