Matrox G450 vs HD Graphics (Haswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1207not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell (2012)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameHaswell GT1Condor
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2012 (13 years ago)1 January 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10no data
Core clock speed200 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data10 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm180 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.25
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI
Lengthno data150 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data332 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.16.0
OpenGLno dataNone
OpenCLno dataNone
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2012 1 January 2001
Chip lithography 22 nm 180 nm

HD Graphics (Haswell) has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 718% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics (Haswell) and Matrox G450. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Haswell) is a notebook graphics card while Matrox G450 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 32 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Haswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Matrox G450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Haswell) or Matrox G450, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.