Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD vs HD Graphics (Haswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1198not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell (2012)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code nameHaswell GT1Montevina
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2012 (13 years ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1010
Core clock speed200 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology22 nm65 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width64/128 Bitno data
Shared memory++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.110

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics (Haswell) 3278
+2161%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD 145

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2012 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm

HD Graphics (Haswell) has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics (Haswell) and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 30 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Haswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 253 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Haswell) or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.