Radeon HD 4225 vs HD Graphics 630

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	718	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	92
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.09	no data
Architecture	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)	RV6xx (2007−2010)
GPU code name	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2	RS880M
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	1 January 2017 (7 years ago)	1 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price	$370	no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	24	40
Core clock speed	300 MHz	380 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	189 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	26.40	no data
Floating-point performance	441.6 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 630 and Radeon HD 4225 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	no data
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	no data
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

+

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	10.1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.1	no data
Vulkan	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & Cons Summary

---

Recency	1 January 2017	1 May 2010
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	55 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---