GeForce GT 520 PCI vs HD Graphics 630

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking759not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.21no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2GF119
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)13 April 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19248
Core clock speed350 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt29 Watt
Texture fill rate24.006.480
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs34
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 GB1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2017 13 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 29 Watt

HD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 93.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 630 and GeForce GT 520 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 630 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 520 PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCI
GeForce GT 520 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1235 votes

Rate HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.