GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL vs HD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking809not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.54no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2NV40
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 January 2017 (8 years ago)14 April 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed350 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate24.006.400
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs316
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP Pro 8x
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 GB256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared550 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data35.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2017 14 April 2004
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

HD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 630 and GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 630 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL
GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1387 votes

Rate HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 630 or GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.