GeForce GT 610 vs HD Graphics 620

Place in performance ranking	801	1103
Place by popularity	41	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.48	0.01
Architecture	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Kaby-Lake GT2	GF119
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 August 2016 (7 years ago)	2 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$39.99
Current price	$353	$98 (2.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics 620 has 4700% better value for money than GT 610.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	24	48
CUDA cores	no data	48
Core clock speed	300 MHz	810 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	189 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	29 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	102 °C
Texture fill rate	25.20	6.5 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	403.2 gflops	155.5 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 620 and GeForce GT 610 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Height	no data	2.7" (6.9 cm)
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	1024 MB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	no data	+
HDCP	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	no data	+
Quick Sync	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.2
OpenCL	2.1	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 620 2.42
+203%

GT 610 0.80

HD Graphics 620 outperforms GeForce GT 610 by 203% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 620 935
+204%

GT 610 308

HD Graphics 620 outperforms GeForce GT 610 by 204% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 620 934
+152%

GT 610 370

HD Graphics 620 outperforms GeForce GT 610 by 152% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

14
+250%

4−5

−250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
+400%

1−2

−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	0−1
Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	6 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	11 +267%	3−4 −267%
Hitman 3	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5 +400%	1−2 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	0−1
Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4	0−1
Metro Exodus	3−4	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 +400%	1−2 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	0−1
Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%

This is how HD Graphics 620 and GT 610 compete in popular games:

HD Graphics 620 is 250% faster than GT 610 in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.42	0.80
Recency	30 August 2016	2 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	1024 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	29 Watt