ATI Radeon X800 XL AGP vs HD Graphics 615

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking983not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.49no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2R430
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 August 2016 (9 years ago)1 May 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate20.406.400
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs316
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2016 1 May 2004
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 49 Watt

HD Graphics 615 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 686% more advanced lithography process, and 880% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 615 and Radeon X800 XL AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 615 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X800 XL AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 87 votes

Rate HD Graphics 615 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon X800 XL AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 615 or Radeon X800 XL AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.