Intel HD Graphics 615 vs HD Graphics 4000
Comparison of HD Graphics 615 and HD Graphics 4000 architecture, market type and release date.
HD Graphics 615 and HD Graphics 4000's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of HD Graphics 615 and HD Graphics 4000's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
25.2 GTexel / s
20.8 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on HD Graphics 615 and HD Graphics 4000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 1.0 x16
Parameters of memory installed on HD Graphics 615 and HD Graphics 4000: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
DDR3L / LPDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on HD Graphics 615 and HD Graphics 4000.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by HD Graphics 615 and HD Graphics 4000. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by HD Graphics 615 and HD Graphics 4000, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of HD Graphics 615 and HD Graphics 4000. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
HD Graphics 615 1.31 +1355.6%
HD Graphics 4000 0.09
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
HD Graphics 615 70743 +59.6%
HD Graphics 4000 44324
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
HD Graphics 615 6387 +69.5%
HD Graphics 4000 3769
3DMark Fire Strike Score
HD Graphics 615 762 +71.6%
HD Graphics 4000 444
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
HD Graphics 615 853 +77.7%
HD Graphics 4000 480
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
HD Graphics 615 1243 +137.7%
HD Graphics 4000 523
3DMark Vantage Performance
HD Graphics 615 4102 +38.6%
HD Graphics 4000 2959
HD Graphics 615 721 +58.8%
HD Graphics 4000 454
Let's see how good HD Graphics 615 and HD Graphics 4000 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 615
1355.6% faster (about 14.5 times) in synthetic tests
Much newer (30 August 2016 vs 14 May 2012)
More pipelines (192 vs 128)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 22 nm)
Less power hungry (5 vs 45 watts)
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 4000
We are unaware of any advantages of Intel HD Graphics 4000 over Intel HD Graphics 615.
So, HD Graphics 615 or HD Graphics 4000?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends Intel HD Graphics 615.
Should you still have questions on choice between HD Graphics 615 and HD Graphics 4000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.