Xe Arctic Sound vs HD Graphics 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking922not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.39no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3Arctic Sound
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844096
Core clock speed300 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate45.60230.4
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs6128
TMUs48256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data1,229 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 500 Watt

HD Graphics 6000 has 3233.3% lower power consumption.

Xe Arctic Sound, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 6000 and Xe Arctic Sound. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 6000 is a notebook graphics card while Xe Arctic Sound is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 6000
HD Graphics 6000
Intel Xe Arctic Sound
Xe Arctic Sound

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 290 votes

Rate HD Graphics 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xe Arctic Sound on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 6000 or Xe Arctic Sound, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.