Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs HD Graphics 6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking931not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.42no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT3Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)7 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3844096
Core clock speed300 MHz1408 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1668 MHz
Number of transistors189 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt345 Watt
Texture fill rate45.60427.0
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS13.66 TFLOPS
ROPs664
TMUs48256
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data282 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared945 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data483.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 7 August 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 345 Watt

HD Graphics 6000 has 2200% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 6000 and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 6000 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 296 votes

Rate HD Graphics 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 30 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 6000 or Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.