GeForce 3 Go vs HD Graphics 5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1158not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.97no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)no data
GPU code nameBroadwell GT2no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)1 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed800 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1,300 million27 Million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20no data
Floating-point processing power0.3072 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing Busno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared32 / 64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)DDR
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 1 February 2002
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 2 Watt

HD Graphics 5300 has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 3 Go, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 5300 and GeForce 3 Go. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 5300
HD Graphics 5300
NVIDIA GeForce 3 Go
GeForce 3 Go

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 34 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 9 votes

Rate GeForce 3 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 5300 or GeForce 3 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.