GMA X3500 vs HD Graphics 5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1158not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.96no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT2Bearlake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)1 August 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz667 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate19.205.336
Floating-point processing power0.3072 TFLOPSno data
ROPs31
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 1 August 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt

HD Graphics 5300 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X3500, on the other hand, has 15.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 5300 and GMA X3500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 5300 is a notebook graphics card while GMA X3500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 5300
HD Graphics 5300
Intel GMA X3500
GMA X3500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 34 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 13 votes

Rate GMA X3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 5300 or GMA X3500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.