Tesla S2050 vs HD Graphics 530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking886not rated
Place by popularity98not in top-100
Power efficiency12.24no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2GF100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192448 ×4
Core clock speed350 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt900 Watt
Texture fill rate22.8032.14 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.3648 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs348 ×4
TMUs2456 ×4
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 GB3 GB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared773 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data148.4 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 900 Watt

HD Graphics 530 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 2033.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 5900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 530 and Tesla S2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 530 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla S2050 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 530
HD Graphics 530
NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1847 votes

Rate HD Graphics 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 530 or Tesla S2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.