Radeon Instinct MI325X vs HD Graphics 530

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking818not rated
Place by popularity100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.05no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19219456
Core clock speed350 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors189 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate22.802,554
Floating-point processing power0.3648 TFLOPS81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs3no data
TMUs241216
Tensor Coresno data1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount64 GB288 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2525 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.3 TB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 288 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 750 Watt

HD Graphics 530 has 4900% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI325X, on the other hand, has a 350% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 530 and Radeon Instinct MI325X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 530 is a notebook card while Radeon Instinct MI325X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 530
HD Graphics 530
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
Radeon Instinct MI325X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1481 vote

Rate HD Graphics 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI325X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.