Mobility Radeon X1900 vs HD Graphics 530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking784not rated
Place by popularity72not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.17no data
ArchitectureGen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2M59
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 August 2015 (8 years ago)11 January 2007 (17 years ago)
Current price$526 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2444
Core clock speed350 MHz8 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors189 million384 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate27.604.800
Floating-point performance403.2 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 530 and Mobility Radeon X1900 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4DDR1/DDR2/GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared960 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data30.72 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 August 2015 11 January 2007
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 530 and Mobility Radeon X1900. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 530
HD Graphics 530
ATI Mobility Radeon X1900
Mobility Radeon X1900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1332 votes

Rate HD Graphics 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon X1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.