ATI Radeon X1300 CE vs HD Graphics 520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking885not rated
Place by popularity73not in top-100
Power efficiency9.75no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2RV505
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)27 October 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate21.601.400
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPSno data
ROPs34
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4DDR2
Maximum RAM amount32 GB128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 27 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 27 Watt

HD Graphics 520 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 520 and Radeon X1300 CE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 520 is a notebook card while Radeon X1300 CE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 520
HD Graphics 520
ATI Radeon X1300 CE
Radeon X1300 CE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3314 votes

Rate HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1300 CE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 520 or Radeon X1300 CE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.