Radeon RX 5770 vs HD Graphics 520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking929not rated
Place by popularity69not in top-100
Power efficiency10.18no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4no data
Maximum RAM amount32 GBno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14000 MHz
Shared memory+no data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

HD Graphics 520 has 1400% lower power consumption.

RX 5770, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 520 and Radeon RX 5770. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 520 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 520
HD Graphics 520
AMD Radeon RX 5770
Radeon RX 5770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3539 votes

Rate HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 14 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 520 or Radeon RX 5770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.