HD Graphics 32EU Mobile vs HD Graphics 520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking944not rated
Place by popularity68not in top-100
Power efficiency10.30no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2Bay Trail GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)2 September 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19232
Core clock speed300 MHz311 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz646 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate21.602.584
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS0.04134 TFLOPS
ROPs31
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.0
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 2 September 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 4 Watt

HD Graphics 520 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 57% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 32EU Mobile, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 520 and HD Graphics 32EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3722 votes

Rate HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 7 votes

Rate HD Graphics 32EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 520 or HD Graphics 32EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.