GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 64M vs HD Graphics 520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking908not rated
Place by popularity62not in top-100
Power efficiency10.04no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2NV34 B1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate21.601.000
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPSno data
ROPs34
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 8x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amount32 GB64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

HD Graphics 520 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 520 and GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 64M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 520
HD Graphics 520
NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 64M
GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 64M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3436 votes

Rate HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 64M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 520 or GeForce FX Go5200 NPB 64M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.