GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs HD Graphics 520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking915not rated
Place by popularity86not in top-100
Power efficiency10.09no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2GT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)12 July 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19216
Core clock speed300 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate21.604.160
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs34
TMUs248
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4DDR2
Maximum RAM amount32 GB512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 12 July 2010
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

HD Graphics 520 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 520 and GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 520 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 520
HD Graphics 520
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3468 votes

Rate HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 520 or GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.