Arc B580 vs HD Graphics 520

Place in the ranking	868	100
Place by popularity	47	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	93.08
Power efficiency	9.90	14.69
Architecture	Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)	Xe2 (2025)
GPU code name	Skylake GT2	BMG-G21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2015 (9 years ago)	16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	2560
Core clock speed	300 MHz	2670 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	2670 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	21.60	427.2
Floating-point processing power	0.3456 TFLOPS	13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	80
TMUs	24	160
Tensor Cores	no data	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	456.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 520 2.16

Arc B580 40.60
+1780%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 520 831

Arc B580 15607
+1778%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	20 −1650%	350−400 +1650%
Full HD	10 −1150%	125 +1150%
1440p	3−4 −2200%	69 +2200%
4K	2−3 −2050%	43 +2050%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	1.99
1440p	no data	3.61
4K	no data	5.79

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1688%	143 +1688%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1733%	110−120 +1733%
Elden Ring	5−6 −1700%	90−95 +1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −2550%	100−110 +2550%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1363%	117 +1363%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1733%	110−120 +1733%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1718%	200−210 +1718%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −3133%	95−100 +3133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −778%	75−80 +778%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −2550%	100−110 +2550%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1200%	104 +1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1733%	110−120 +1733%
Dota 2	11 −1173%	140 +1173%
Elden Ring	5−6 −2760%	140−150 +2760%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −393%	69 +393%
Fortnite	10−12 −1500%	170−180 +1500%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1718%	200−210 +1718%
Grand Theft Auto V	3 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1100%	36 +1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −867%	200−210 +867%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −778%	75−80 +778%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3 −4733%	140−150 +4733%
World of Tanks	30 −830%	270−280 +830%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −2550%	100−110 +2550%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1088%	95 +1088%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1733%	110−120 +1733%
Dota 2	22 −1718%	400−450 +1718%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −607%	95−100 +607%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1718%	200−210 +1718%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −867%	200−210 +867%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	0−1	69
Elden Ring	1−2 −8300%	80−85 +8300%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −1767%	280−290 +1767%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −4000%	40−45 +4000%
World of Tanks	14−16 −1743%	250−260 +1743%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −7300%	70−75 +7300%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −90.6%	61 +90.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1775%	75−80 +1775%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −2100%	130−140 +2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1700%	90−95 +1700%
Valorant	8−9 −1525%	130−140 +1525%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −388%	78 +388%
Elden Ring	1−2 −3900%	40−45 +3900%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1767%	280−290 +1767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −2100%	130−140 +2100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −2600%	27−30 +2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1767%	280−290 +1767%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −2300%	45−50 +2300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Dota 2	16−18 −1775%	300−310 +1775%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2950%	60−65 +2950%
Fortnite	0−1	55−60
Valorant	2−3 −3350%	65−70 +3350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Valorant

160−170

+0%

160−170

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant

160−170

+0%

160−170

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant

160−170

+0%

160−170

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus

85−90

+0%

85−90

+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	46 +0%	46 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

40−45

+0%

40−45

+0%

This is how HD Graphics 520 and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

Arc B580 is 1650% faster in 900p
Arc B580 is 1150% faster in 1080p
Arc B580 is 2200% faster in 1440p
Arc B580 is 2050% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Elden Ring, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc B580 is 8300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Arc B580 is ahead in 34 tests (83%)
there's a draw in 7 tests (17%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.16	40.60
Recency	1 September 2015	16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	190 Watt

HD Graphics 520 has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1166.7% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 1779.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 520 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 520 is a notebook card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.