ATI Radeon 7200 64 MB vs HD Graphics 515

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking994not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.73no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2R100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)1 April 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate19.201
Floating-point processing power0.3072 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32
TMUs246

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.312 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 1 April 2000
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 23 Watt

HD Graphics 515 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 53.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 515 and Radeon 7200 64 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 515 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7200 64 MB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 515
HD Graphics 515
ATI Radeon 7200 64 MB
Radeon 7200 64 MB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 63 votes

Rate HD Graphics 515 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 64 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 515 or Radeon 7200 64 MB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.