Matrox Millennium G200A vs HD Graphics 515

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1008not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.78no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)G200 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2Calao
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz84 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data10 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate19.200.08
Floating-point processing power0.3072 TFLOPSno data
ROPs31
TMUs241

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCI
Lengthno data150 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared112 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data896.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)5.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL3.0None
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 250 nm

HD Graphics 515 has a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 515 and Matrox Millennium G200A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 515 is a notebook graphics card while Matrox Millennium G200A is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 515
HD Graphics 515
Matrox Millennium G200A
Millennium G200A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 65 votes

Rate HD Graphics 515 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Millennium G200A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 515 or Matrox Millennium G200A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.