Radeon R9 290X2 vs HD Graphics 505

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1189not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.01no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1.5Hawaii
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2016 (9 years ago)24 June 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1442816 ×2
Core clock speed200 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt580 Watt
Texture fill rate11.70176.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.1872 TFLOPS5.632 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs364 ×2
TMUs18176 ×2
L1 Cacheno data704 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data4x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data345.6 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2016 24 June 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 580 Watt

HD Graphics 505 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 5700% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 505 and Radeon R9 290X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 505 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 290X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 505
HD Graphics 505
AMD Radeon R9 290X2
Radeon R9 290X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 287 votes

Rate HD Graphics 505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 505 or Radeon R9 290X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.