GeForce FX 5700 LE vs HD Graphics 505

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1187not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.01no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1.5NV36
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2016 (9 years ago)1 March 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144no data
Core clock speed200 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate11.701.000
Floating-point processing power0.1872 TFLOPSno data
ROPs34
TMUs184

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2016 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm

HD Graphics 505 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 505 and GeForce FX 5700 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 505 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5700 LE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 505
HD Graphics 505
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE
GeForce FX 5700 LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 285 votes

Rate HD Graphics 505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 22 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 505 or GeForce FX 5700 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.