GMA vs HD Graphics 505

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11351538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.61no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1.5Cloverview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2016 (8 years ago)4 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144no data
Core clock speed200 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate11.701.066
Floating-point processing power0.1872 TFLOPSno data
ROPs31
TMUs182

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 505 359
+17850%
GMA 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Fortnite 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Fortnite 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 5−6 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2016 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm

HD Graphics 505 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 505 and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 505
HD Graphics 505
Intel GMA
GMA

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 265 votes

Rate HD Graphics 505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 505 or GMA, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.