Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile vs HD Graphics 505

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1195not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.04no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1.5Panther Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2016 (9 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144256
Core clock speed200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate11.7036.80
Floating-point processing power0.1872 TFLOPS1.1776 TFLOPS
ROPs38
TMUs1816
Ray Tracing Coresno data2
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2016 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 25 Watt

HD Graphics 505 has 150% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 505 and Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 294 votes

Rate HD Graphics 505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 505 or Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.