GeForce RTX 3080 vs HD Graphics 500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 500 with GeForce RTX 3080, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 500
2015
8 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 10 Watt
0.77

RTX 3080 outperforms HD Graphics 500 by a whopping 8399% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking115226
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.29
Power efficiency8.7914.01
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1GA102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores968704
Core clock speed200 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz1710 MHz
Number of transistors189 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate7.800465.1
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPS29.77 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs12272
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data68

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB10 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1188 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data760.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 500 0.77
RTX 3080 65.44
+8399%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 500 298
RTX 3080 25210
+8360%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD Graphics 500 482
RTX 3080 53713
+11044%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 500 363
RTX 3080 39257
+10730%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 500 3007
RTX 3080 188064
+6154%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 500 24609
RTX 3080 529548
+2052%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−1570%
167
+1570%
1440p1
−12600%
127
+12600%
4K1−2
−8400%
85
+8400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.19
1440pno data5.50
4Kno data8.22

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4100%
120−130
+4100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2600%
130−140
+2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3767%
110−120
+3767%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4500%
138
+4500%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−15800%
150−160
+15800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2220%
116
+2220%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1917%
240−250
+1917%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 131
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4417%
270−280
+4417%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−700%
248
+700%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2600%
130−140
+2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3767%
110−120
+3767%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4367%
134
+4367%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−15800%
150−160
+15800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2260%
118
+2260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1917%
240−250
+1917%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 120−130
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−5333%
326
+5333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1290%
130−140
+1290%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−668%
238
+668%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2600%
130−140
+2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3767%
110−120
+3767%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4267%
131
+4267%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2100%
110
+2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1417%
182
+1417%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4683%
287
+4683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1390%
149
+1390%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−226%
101
+226%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 131

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 150−160
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−10200%
100−110
+10200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 75−80
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8500%
86
+8500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7600%
75−80
+7600%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1500%
112
+1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−3675%
151
+3675%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−12250%
247
+12250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−4233%
130
+4233%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 65−70

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 52
Far Cry 5 0−1 45−50

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4650%
95
+4650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 111
+0%
111
+0%
Battlefield 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 96
+0%
96
+0%
Battlefield 5 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
+0%
88
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+0%
76
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 107
+0%
107
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 219
+0%
219
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hitman 3 57
+0%
57
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 142
+0%
142
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
+0%
115
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
+0%
43
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 135
+0%
135
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 54
+0%
54
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 500 and RTX 3080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 is 1570% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3080 is 12600% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3080 is 8400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3080 is 15800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3080 is ahead in 35 tests (55%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 65.44
Recency 1 September 2015 1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 320 Watt

HD Graphics 500 has 3100% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080, on the other hand, has a 8398.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3080 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 500 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 500 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 707 votes

Rate HD Graphics 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6114 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.