GRID K500 vs HD Graphics 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking984not rated
Place by popularity65not in top-100
Power efficiency6.53no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2GK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 May 2013 (12 years ago)2 July 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1601536 ×2
Core clock speed400 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate22.0095.36 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs232 ×2
TMUs20128 ×2
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 2 July 2014
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 225 Watt

HD Graphics 4600 has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

GRID K500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4600 and GRID K500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4600 is a notebook graphics card while GRID K500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 4600
NVIDIA GRID K500
GRID K500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 3001 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4600 or GRID K500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.