FirePro M3900 vs HD Graphics 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1185not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.52no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Seymour
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date2 September 2013 (12 years ago)19 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160160
Core clock speed200 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors392 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate17.006.000
Floating-point processing power0.272 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs208
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno datan/a
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Form factorno datachip-down

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.34.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2013 19 October 2010
Chip lithography 22 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 20 Watt

HD Graphics 4200 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 82% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4200 and FirePro M3900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4200 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 42 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4200 or FirePro M3900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.