Arc 3 A370M vs HD Graphics 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1162not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.14no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 September 2013 (11 years ago)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1601024
Core clock speed200 MHzno data
Boost clock speed850 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors392 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate17.0099.20
Floating-point processing power0.272 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs2064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2013 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 35 Watt

HD Graphics 4200 has 775% lower power consumption.

Arc 3 A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 266.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4200 and Arc 3 A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4200 is a notebook graphics card while Arc 3 A370M is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4200
HD Graphics 4200
Intel Arc 3 A370M
Arc 3 A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 42 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 14 votes

Rate Arc 3 A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4200 or Arc 3 A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.