ATI Radeon X1650 PRO AGP vs HD Graphics 405

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1227not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.83no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1RV535
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (10 years ago)15 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed200 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million330 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt44 Watt
Texture fill rate9.6002.400
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.32.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 15 October 2006
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 44 Watt

HD Graphics 405 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 405 and Radeon X1650 PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 405 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1650 PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 405
HD Graphics 405
ATI Radeon X1650 PRO AGP
Radeon X1650 PRO AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 277 votes

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 405 or Radeon X1650 PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.