ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs HD Graphics 405

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11801548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.42no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (10 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed200 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate9.6000.8
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.31.4
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2 no data

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 4−5 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 1 March 2003
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 28 Watt

HD Graphics 405 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 971.4% more advanced lithography process, and 366.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 405 and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 405 is a notebook card while Radeon 9200 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 405
HD Graphics 405
ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon 9200 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 222 votes

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 69 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 405 or Radeon 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.