ATI Graphics Ultra + vs HD Graphics 405

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1232not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.86no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)no data
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Mach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)1 January 1992 (34 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed200 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Wattno data
Texture fill rate9.600no data
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPSno data
ROPs21
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDRAM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared10 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)None
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.3None
OpenCL3.0None
Vulkan+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 1 January 1992
Chip lithography 14 nm 800 nm

HD Graphics 405 has an age advantage of 23 years, and a 5614% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 405 and Graphics Ultra +. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 405 is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Ultra + is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 281 votes

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 405 or Graphics Ultra +, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.