GeForce GTX 285 X2 vs HD Graphics 405

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1211not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.77no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1GT200B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (10 years ago)17 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128240 ×2
Core clock speed200 MHz648 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt315 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60051.84 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPS0.7085 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs232 ×2
TMUs1680 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data275 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1152 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data147.5 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.33.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 17 June 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 315 Watt

HD Graphics 405 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 5150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 405 and GeForce GTX 285 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 405 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 285 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 405
HD Graphics 405
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 X2
GeForce GTX 285 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 235 votes

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 285 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 405 or GeForce GTX 285 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.