Tesla A100 vs HD Graphics 4000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1062not rated
Place by popularity42not in top-100
Power efficiency1.83no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT2GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1287936
Core clock speed650 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,200 million38,000 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown260 Watt
Texture fill rate16.00550.6
Floating-point processing power0.256 TFLOPS17.62 TFLOPS
ROPs2128
TMUs16496

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared40 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,229 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2012 14 May 2020
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm

Tesla A100 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4000 and Tesla A100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook card while Tesla A100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000
NVIDIA Tesla A100
Tesla A100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 5204 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 237 votes

Rate Tesla A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.