Quadro RTX 6000 vs HD Graphics 4000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

HD Graphics 4000
2011
System Shared System Shared
1.17

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 4065% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking102757
Place by popularity37not in top-100
Value for money0.1310.06
ArchitectureGen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameIvy BridgeTU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 March 2011 (13 years old)13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299
Current price$91 $3083 (0.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 6000 has 7638% better value for money than HD Graphics 4000.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164608
Core clock speed350 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors1,200 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown260 Watt
Texture fill rate20.80509.8
Floating-point performance33.6 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 4000 and Quadro RTX 6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.801.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 4000 1.17
RTX 6000 48.73
+4065%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 4065% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 4000 454
RTX 6000 18872
+4057%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 4057% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12
−3650%
450−500
+3650%
Full HD11
−3991%
450−500
+3991%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−3789%
350−400
+3789%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Hitman 3 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4043%
290−300
+4043%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−3789%
350−400
+3789%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Hitman 3 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4043%
290−300
+4043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−3900%
200−210
+3900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Hitman 3 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−4043%
290−300
+4043%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3900%
120−130
+3900%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−3900%
200−210
+3900%

This is how HD Graphics 4000 and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • RTX 6000 is 3650% faster than HD Graphics 4000

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 6000 is 3991% faster than HD Graphics 4000

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.17 48.73
Recency 23 March 2011 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 24 GB
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 4650 votes

Rate Intel HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 122 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.