FirePro S9300 X2 vs HD Graphics 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1123not rated
Place by popularity60not in top-100
Power efficiency1.84no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT2Capsaicin
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 May 2012 (13 years ago)31 March 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1284096 ×2
Core clock speed650 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,200 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown300 Watt
Texture fill rate16.00217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.256 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs264 ×2
TMUs16256 ×2
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.0
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2012 31 March 2016
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm

HD Graphics 4000 has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

S9300 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4000 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 5853 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4000 or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.