Tesla X2070 vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1146not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.35no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1GF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96512
Core clock speed320 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate7.20041.66
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs1264
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared924 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data177.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 225 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 186% more advanced lithography process, and 3650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Tesla X2070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla X2070 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 455 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Tesla X2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or Tesla X2070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.