Tesla K80m vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1146not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.35no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1GK210
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)17 November 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962x 2496
Core clock speed320 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistors189 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2002x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPSno data
ROPs22x 48
TMUs122x 208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2x 12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared5012 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2x 240.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 17 November 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 300 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has an age advantage of 4 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 4900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 456 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or Tesla K80m, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.