Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1146not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.35no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)1 June 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963584
Core clock speed320 MHz1138 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1301 MHz
Number of transistors189 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200291.4
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS9.326 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs12224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LHBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data409.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 1 June 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 120 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 1900% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 56 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 456 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.