Radeon Pro 570X vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1136not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.32no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Polaris 20
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 April 2015 (10 years ago)18 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961792
Core clock speed320 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1105 MHz
Number of transistors189 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200123.8
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS3.96 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs12112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data217.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 18 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 120 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1900% lower power consumption.

Pro 570X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Radeon Pro 570X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 570X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
AMD Radeon Pro 570X
Radeon Pro 570X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 445 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 46 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 570X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or Radeon Pro 570X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.